Every conversation we have with an aviation business arrives at the same question within about ten minutes. What is this thing allowed to decide?
The answer is nothing that carries accountability. That is not a hedge, it is the whole design.
What it does
It reads what arrives. It gathers what exists. It assembles a pack, drafts a quote, or prepares a submission. It flags what is missing and what looks wrong.
In other words, it does the work that currently fills the day of somebody who is qualified to do something more valuable.
What it never does
It does not issue a release to service. It does not sign a certificate. It does not approve a compliance submission or authorise a return to service. It does not send a quote or a passenger communication without a person reading it first.
Where a regulation puts responsibility on a named individual, that individual keeps it. Nothing about our involvement changes who is accountable, and nothing should.
Why this is the right split
Assembly is repeatable and high volume. Judgement is not. Automating the first while protecting the second is how you get capacity without taking on risk.
It is also, practically, the only version of this that any serious aviation business would agree to. Which is why it is the only version we build.